The promise of noöpolitik
by David Ronfeldt and John Arquilla
This is another interesting article from First Monday, about the noosphere - a realm of communal mind conceived of 80 years ago by Teilhard de Chardin, but only now enabled by cyperspace - and its impact on grand strategy and diplomacy in the form of noöpolitik.  The authors' thoughts on noöpolitik will be collected in a forthcoming handbook on public diplomacy. 
| Table 1: Contrast between realpolitik and noöpolitik. | |
| Realpolitik | Noöpolitik | 
| States as the unit of analysis | Nodes, non–state actors | 
| Primacy of hard power (resources, etc.) | Primacy of soft power | 
| Power politics as zero–sum game | Win–win, lose–lose possible | 
| System is anarchic, highly conflictual | Harmony of interests, cooperation | 
| Alliance conditional (oriented to threat) | Ally webs vital to security | 
| Primacy of national self–interest | Primacy of shared interests | 
| Politics as unending quest for advantage | Explicitly seeking a telos | 
| Ethos is amoral, if not immoral | Ethics crucially important | 
| Behavior driven by threat and power | Common goals drive actors | 
| Very guarded about information flows | Propensity for info–sharing | 
| Balance of power as the “steady–state” | Balance of responsibilities | 
| Power embedded in nation–states | Power in “global fabric” | 

 
 
